Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 1144720220260010010
Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging
2022 Volume.26 No. 1 p.10 ~ p.19
Added Value of Contrast Leakage Information over the CBV Value of DSC Perfusion MRI to Differentiate between Pseudoprogression and True Progression after Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Glioblastoma Patients
Pak Elena

Choi Seung-Hong
Park Chul-Kee
Kim Tae-MIn
Park Sung-Hye
Won Jae-Kyung
Lee Joo-Ho
Lee Soon-Tae
Hwang In-Pyeong
Yoo Roh-Eul
Kang Koung-Mi
Yun Tae-Jin
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate whether the added value of contrast leakage information from dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging (DSC MRI) is a better prognostic imaging biomarker than the cerebral blood volume (CBV) value in distinguishing true progression from pseudoprogression in glioblastoma patients.

Materials and Methods: Forty-nine glioblastoma patients who had undergone MRI after concurrent chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide were enrolled in this retrospective study. Twenty features were extracted from the normalized relative CBV (nCBV) and extraction fraction (EF) map of the contrast-enhancing region in each patient. After univariable analysis, we used multivariable stepwise logistic regression analysis to identify significant predictors for differentiating between pseudoprogression and true progression. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was employed to determine the best cutoff values for the nCBV and EF features. Finally, leave-one-out cross-validation was used to validate the best predictor in differentiating between true progression and pseudoprogression.

Results: Multivariable stepwise logistic regression analysis showed that MGMT (O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase) and EF max were independent differentiating variables (P = 0.004 and P = 0.02, respectively). ROC analysis yielded the best cutoff value of 95.75 for the EF max value for differentiating the two groups (sensitivity, 61%; specificity, 84.6%; AUC, 0.681 ¡¾ 0.08; 95% CI, 0.524-0.837; P = 0.03). In the leave-one-out cross-validation of the EF max value, the cross-validated values for predicting true progression and pseudoprogression accuracies were 69.4% and 71.4%, respectively.

Conclusion: We demonstrated that contrast leakage information parameter from DSC MRI showed significance in differentiating true progression from pseudoprogression in glioblastoma patients.
KEYWORD
Dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI, Extraction fraction, Pseudoprogression, Glioblastoma, True progression
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed ´ëÇÑÀÇÇÐȸ ȸ¿ø